[tlhIngan Hol] where the {'e'} of a sao refers
SuStel
sustel at trimboli.name
Wed Feb 7 08:02:14 PST 2018
On 2/7/2018 10:53 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> By "dependent clauses on either half of a sao", you mean the {tlhIngan
> maH; taHjaj}
No. *tlhIngan maH; taHjaj* is not a sentence as object as defined by
TKD. It is two sentences, pushed together because they're closely related.
You /could/ put dependent clauses on either of these sentences and it
would still be grammatical (though it would mean something else).
*maquvchugh tlhIngan maH; taHjaj
tlhIngan maH maquvchugh; taHjaj
*/If we are honorable, we are Klingon; may it continue./
*tlhIngan maH; maquvchugh taHjaj
tlhIngan maH; taHjaj maquvchugh
*/We are Klingon; if we are honorable, may it continue./
When I say "dependent clause," I mean a verbal clause with a type 9
suffix on the verb that makes it need to have a main clause. These are
described in TKD as "subordinate clauses," "relative clauses," and
"purpose clauses."
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20180207/2b76737f/attachment.htm>
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list