[tlhIngan Hol] tarDIghaD

[mayqel qunenoS]

I don't know who actually wrote it. loghaD wrote {Kaspersky chaw' ngoq
chovwI' <https://password.kaspersky.com/klingon/>vaD mu'vam lo'lu'}

Since he wrote {lo'lu'} and not {vIlo'}, then obviously someone else must
have written it.

qunnoq

On Sep 13, 2017 8:03 PM, "SuStel" <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 9/13/2017 12:30 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>
> > qaStaHvIS poHvam, chImchu'bogh loghDaq > taHlaHtaH tarDIghaD, tera'
> Ha'DIbaHHom
> > pujHa’qu’.
>
> The {tera' Ha'DIbaHHom} which follows the {taHlaHtaH tarDIghaD} separated
> from it by a comma, is rather nice because it serves to explain to the
> reader, what this tarDIghaD actually is.
>
> The separation by the comma, of the words which follow it,
> recreate/resemble the way someone would change the tone of his voice if he
> was actually speaking these words, in order to further define the nature of
> the tarDIghaD he is talking about.
>
>
> This is a common way to indicate noun phrases in apposition.
>
> > pa' chaw' ngoqvam baghHa’meH ’oH, De'wI'
>  > motlh lo'laH.  'ach Do' 'e' ta' neHbe' 'oH.
>
> And here, the interesting part is the {'ach Do'} before the {'e'}.
>
> [...]
>
> So, the question is whether the tarDIghaD passage is considered canon.
>
> Canon? Isn't this just a translation of something by loghaD?
>
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170913/565d972f/attachment-0016.htm>