[tlhIngan Hol] tarDIghaD

[SuStel]

On 9/13/2017 12:30 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> > qaStaHvIS poHvam, chImchu'bogh loghDaq > taHlaHtaH tarDIghaD, tera' 
> Ha'DIbaHHom
> > pujHa’qu’.
>
> The {tera' Ha'DIbaHHom} which follows the {taHlaHtaH tarDIghaD} 
> separated from it by a comma, is rather nice because it serves to 
> explain to the reader, what this tarDIghaD actually is.
>
> The separation by the comma, of the words which follow it, 
> recreate/resemble the way someone would change the tone of his voice 
> if he was actually speaking these words, in order to further define 
> the nature of the tarDIghaD he is talking about.

This is a common way to indicate noun phrases in apposition.


> > pa' chaw' ngoqvam baghHa’meH ’oH, De'wI'
>  > motlh lo'laH.  'ach Do' 'e' ta' neHbe' 'oH.
>
> And here, the interesting part is the {'ach Do'} before the {'e'}.
>
> [...]
>
> So, the question is whether the tarDIghaD passage is considered canon.

Canon? Isn't this just a translation of something by loghaD?

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170913/97a0b25e/attachment-0016.htm>