[tlhIngan Hol] qep'a' cha'maH loSDIch New words and some tidbits

[Lieven]

Am 29.07.2017 um 06:38 schrieb Tad Stauffer:> {-Qo'} - The way I'm 
interpreting this, the new/clarified info is that > {-Qo'} and {-be'} 
can both be used on an imperative at the same time:[...]
> If this has been discussed at the qep'a', could someone confirm that my 
> middle example {yISuvbe'Qo'} is correct?

I'm not at the qep'a', but I had forwarded this question to Okrand 
before the qep'a', but he asked to reveal the answer not before the 
qep'a'. As this topic seems unleashed now, I think it's okay to forward 
his message.

The question actually arose from a phrase like {HIleghbe'moH} which is a 
command including the suffix {-be'}. Some argued that this is not 
allowed, that's why the clarification was made.

Summary:
TKD mentions that "The suffix -be' cannot be used with imperative verbs" 
which is a bit misleading. It does not mean that -be' cannot be used at 
all within imperatives, it just means that it is not used to say 
"don't". So the phrase {yIleghbe'moH} "Cause him to not see" follows the 
rules properly.

http://www.qephom.de/e/message_from_maltz_170720.html

-- 
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Rover