[tlhIngan Hol] <<poSayDon>> vImughlI'

[SuStel]

On 1/19/2017 7:58 PM, Brian Cote wrote:
> maj!
>
> At the risk of igniting this discussion again, I'd considered using 
> {vabDot} where you suggested, but I'd thought it was still a bit risky 
> to use. Was I incorrect?

No, it's risky, but it's a different kind of risk than using, say, some 
experimental or unproved form of grammar. The word means /something,/ 
whereas some piece of funky grammar may be meaningless. The risk is that 
*vabDot* may not mean what we think it means.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170120/7a87e013/attachment-0016.htm>