[tlhIngan Hol] -lI': intentional or not?

Lieven levinius at gmx.de
Tue Feb 28 08:45:33 PST 2017

Am 28.02.2017 um 16:26 schrieb SuStel:
> None of them are used to describe an agentless action, lending credence
> to the argument that the dearth of agentless *-lI'* shows that it isn't
> allowed.

Could you rephrase that, so that a non-native english speaking 
non-linguist can understand, please.

Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list