[tlhIngan Hol] Is Star Trek: Discovery a new canon category?

Lieven levinius at gmx.de
Thu Aug 10 22:51:59 PDT 2017


Am 11.08.2017 um 04:28 schrieb nIqolay Q:
> One of the major differences between Discovery and Klingon Hamlet is 
> that Discovery is going to be Actual Star Trek Canon.

There's the point: it's "Star Trek" canon, but still not pour Okrandian 
canon. Remember all the gibberish we'se seen on Deep Space nine? That 
certainly is canon, but wo don't even understand a word from it.

Turning this around, did you know that the Star Trek wiki Memory Alpha 
does NOT consider {tlhIngan Hol} as canon? They regard only things seen 
on screen, so the books which we highly praise are non existent for them.

Although I would love to see all Discovery phrases as being (our) canon, 
I must agree that these must be considered as a secondary work like 
Hamlet etc. -- at least until Marc Okrand puts his name under it 
confirming that he has checked and approved all of them.


-- 
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/IsDiscoveryCanon ?



More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list