[tlhIngan Hol] A disturbing realization

[mayqel qunenoS]

first, when I say "direct quote", I don't mean it in the sense "did he
literally say each word". I'm asking about whether he's the source or not.

second I'm not questioning voragh. however, before I write something in my
notes I want to know who said it.

third, when the list archives are easier to search, then I will begin using
tem.

qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 11 Nov 2016 9:14 pm, "Alan Anderson" <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:14 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >  'at, bay, chay, Day, 'et, ghay ... 'ut, way, yay, qaghwI'.
>> > To refer to an alphabet, syllabary, etc., we might say *{ngutlhghom} on
>> the model
>> > of {mangghom} {army}, {mu'ghom} "dictionary" and {tIjwI'ghom} "boarding
>> party.
>> > {ngutlhtlhegh} is another option - see {mu'tlhegh} "sentence" and
>> {yutlhegh} "spectrum, (musical) scale".
>>
>> Are the above a direct quote from 'oqranD ?
>
>
> When you have questions of canonicity, it is often instructive to look at
> the source of the information. Voragh is pretty good about giving
> references; in this case "(MO via ghunchu'wI', 7/27/2009)". The mailing
> list archives are online.
>
> http://www.kli.org/tlhIngan-Hol/2009/July/msg00191.html
>
> None of it is a direct quote from Dr. Okrand. We are not [yet] in the
> habit of literally recording everything he speaks.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161111/affd7a6e/attachment-0018.htm>