[tlhIngan Hol] A disturbing realization

[Alan Anderson]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:14 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> >  'at, bay, chay, Day, 'et, ghay ... 'ut, way, yay, qaghwI'.
> > To refer to an alphabet, syllabary, etc., we might say *{ngutlhghom} on
> the model
> > of {mangghom} {army}, {mu'ghom} "dictionary" and {tIjwI'ghom} "boarding
> party.
> > {ngutlhtlhegh} is another option - see {mu'tlhegh} "sentence" and
> {yutlhegh} "spectrum, (musical) scale".
>
> Are the above a direct quote from 'oqranD ?


When you have questions of canonicity, it is often instructive to look at
the source of the information. Voragh is pretty good about giving
references; in this case "(MO via ghunchu'wI', 7/27/2009)". The mailing
list archives are online.

http://www.kli.org/tlhIngan-Hol/2009/July/msg00191.html

None of it is a direct quote from Dr. Okrand. We are not [yet] in the habit
of literally recording everything he speaks.

-- ghunchu'wI'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161111/bfc97c93/attachment-0017.htm>