[tlhIngan Hol] A quick thought on time

[mayqel qunenoS]

and I just thought of an additional question.

Can the {Qoy'lu'pu'} be used with every time-telling klingon method ?

qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 4 Nov 2016 3:04 pm, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> De'vID:
> > cha'maH tup ret wa'maHlogh Qoy'lu'pu',
> > cha'maH tup pIq wa'maH cha'logh
> > Qoy'lu'pu'.
>
> I'm happy to read your reply, because it dissolves a misconception of mine
> with regards to telling time.
>
> However, I need to ask you:
>
> At the examples that you wrote, I noticed that the minutes are being
> written first followed by the hour.
>
> Can someone write the hour first, and then write the minutes ? I mean, can
> I write {wa'maH cha'maHlogh tup ret Qoy'lu'pu'} ?
>
> qunnoH jan puqloD
> ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
>
> On 4 Nov 2016 12:52 pm, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4 November 2016 at 09:24, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > It is a pity that by using this method, one can only express time, if
>> > it is for example one 'o clock, two 'o clock etc.. Unfortunately we
>> > can't express - by the use this method - a time like 10.20, 11.40 etc.
>>
>> cha'maH tup ret wa'maHlogh Qoy'lu'pu', cha'maH tup pIq wa'maH cha'logh
>> Qoy'lu'pu'.
>>
>> No different than "20 after 10" or "20 til 12".
>>
>> --
>> De'vID
>> _______________________________________________
>> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
>> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161104/96003704/attachment-0018.htm>