[tlhIngan Hol] A quick thought on time

[mayqel qunenoS]

De'vID:
> cha'maH tup ret wa'maHlogh Qoy'lu'pu',
> cha'maH tup pIq wa'maH cha'logh
> Qoy'lu'pu'.

I'm happy to read your reply, because it dissolves a misconception of mine
with regards to telling time.

However, I need to ask you:

At the examples that you wrote, I noticed that the minutes are being
written first followed by the hour.

Can someone write the hour first, and then write the minutes ? I mean, can
I write {wa'maH cha'maHlogh tup ret Qoy'lu'pu'} ?

qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 4 Nov 2016 12:52 pm, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4 November 2016 at 09:24, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It is a pity that by using this method, one can only express time, if
> > it is for example one 'o clock, two 'o clock etc.. Unfortunately we
> > can't express - by the use this method - a time like 10.20, 11.40 etc.
>
> cha'maH tup ret wa'maHlogh Qoy'lu'pu', cha'maH tup pIq wa'maH cha'logh
> Qoy'lu'pu'.
>
> No different than "20 after 10" or "20 til 12".
>
> --
> De'vID
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161104/1f7b02be/attachment-0017.htm>