[tlhIngan-Hol] Picard and the crystalline entity

[mayqel qunenoS]

SuStel
> HoSDo 'oHbe'law' qut Dep
ghunchu'wI'
> You probably want {qut} "crystal".

oh yes ! you're right ! I had forgotten that we had the word {qut}.

jIH
> reH pIqarD wIparqu'. 'op ben, DaH.. reH !
ghunchu'wI'
> For what group are you speaking?

I used the plural prefix, in order to practice the "royal we". I
remember some time in the past, we had described a usual problem,
where someone learns to spontaneously use the first person prefixes,
only to eventually become totally unaccustomed to the rest of them. At
that thread someone had written, that in order for someone to overcome
this problem, he needed to practice the "royal we".

Anyway, because I realize now, that this could cause confusion to the
reader, from now on I will specify at the beginning of the post, that
I will be using the "royal we".

ghunchu'wI'
> urghwI' QujlaH.
> 'orwI' po' ghaH.
> Qubchu'mo' vIt SamlaH.
> yanlaH.
> tayqeq tIQ yajlaH.
> tlhIngan cha'DIch gheSlaH.
> jorwI' lInglaH.
> pe'vIl mu'qaDmey bachlaH.
> borgh buq'Ir Qaw'laH jay'.

ghunchu'wI' bIlugh. laH Dojqu' bIH laH'e' DaDelbogh.
ghunchu'wI' you are right. the abilities which you described are impressive.

'ach..
but..

vaQbe' pIqard - HoDqoqvam - ;
picard - this so called captain - isn't aggressive.

HoD bIvaQmeH, beqlI'vaD chut wa'DIch DalobHa'nISlaH.
in order to be an effective captain, for the benefit of your crew you
need to be able to defy the prime directive.

(is the {HoD bIvaQmeH} for "in order (for you) to be an effective
captain" correct ?)

meqvammo', HoD pov ghaH janeway HoD'e' neH.
because of this reason, only janeway HoD is a perfect captain.

meqvammo' neH, tagha' beqDaj toDta' janeway HoD.
only because of this reason, janeway HoD eventually saved her crew.

qaywI' rap bamchugh pIqarD, vaj chut'e' lobHa'ta'bogh janeway, not
lobHa'ta' pIqard.
if picard, faced the same problem, then he would never disobey the law
as janeway did.

'ej meqvetlhmo', beqDajvaD Seng..
and because of this reason his crew would pay the price..

mayqel qunnoQ

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Alan Anderson <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:
> The last time I tried answering a post like this using Klingon only,
> it led to serious confusion. While I will address the content in
> Klingon, I'll give my linguistic comments in English.
>
> 2016-06-06 12:29 GMT-04:00 mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com>:
>> wanI'vam luDel Hov leng puq poH veb muchmey ;
>>
>> HoS Dep tu'lu' 'ej Qobqu' HoS Depvam.
>
> {HoS} means "strength". You probably want {qut} "crystal".
>
>> je''eghmeH Hoch Qaw'taH.. Human,
>> ghot, Ha'DIbaH je. Hoch !
>
> tI lojmoHchu' je. juSpu'DI' Dep tIH, ratlh lam chIm.
>
>> DaH, wam pIqarD HoDqoq ; HoHlaHDI', DuHvam lajQo' ! qatlh ?
>> tlhIbba'mo'. pujba'mo'.  'umHa'ba'mo'.
>
> taymo'.
>
> Hub'eghnISbe'chugh, 'ej vay' Sop 'e' Hechbe'chugh, HoHnISbe'.
> QumlaHlaw' Dep. vallaw'. chaq 'oHmo' ghojlu'.
>
>> reH pIqarD wIparqu'. 'op ben, DaH.. reH !
>
> For what group are you speaking? If you aren't plural, please don't
> misuse the plural subject prefixes. Klingon doesn't have a formal
> singular "we" like some languages do. It is confusing at best, and it
> is presumptuous of you to act as if you are a chorus if you are not.
>
>> SoQmey bIH laHDaj'e'. SoQmey neH. pagh latlh DuHmey ghaj.
>
> urghwI' QujlaH.
> 'orwI' po' ghaH.
> Qubchu'mo' vIt SamlaH.
> yanlaH.
> tayqeq tIQ yajlaH.
> tlhIngan cha'DIch gheSlaH.
> jorwI' lInglaH.
> pe'vIl mu'qaDmey bachlaH.
> borgh buq'Ir Qaw'laH jay'.
>
> latlh HIvje'Daq 'Iw HIq bIr yIqang.
>
>> wIvup..
>
> Davupba' SoH. vIHo' jIH. law'qu' laHDaj.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org