If you want to say “pull/draw the bow [string]” use {Hur}: Hur pull, tug (v) (qepHom 2020) -- “refers to the action of pulling back the string of the bow but also to pulling the handle on a door to open or close the door or to pulling on someone's suspenders” (qepHom 2020) HurDagh chuHwI' bow (for arrows) (n) (qepHom 2020) -- “(not a Klingon device), lit. "stringed-instrument hurler" (qepHom 2020) HurwI' bow (for arrows) (n) (qepHom 2020) -- “short form” (qepHom 2020) Note the use of {chuH} “throw/hurl (a spear) at” in the first word for bow. I suppose a {naQjejHom} “arrow” is after all a small {naQjej} “spear”. Voragh ______________________________________________________________ From: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org> On Behalf Of SuStel On 8/25/2021 7:55 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote: Is there an answer as to whether we {baH} or {bach} a {naQjejHom}? Is there a right answer to this? Or do we pick one in random? Or do we ask qeylIS? Or do we consult with the oracle of the Cat of the Underground? I believe that baH is used for self-propelled weapons, while bach is used for unpowered attacks projected from a device, and chuH is for unpowered hurled attacks. I base this simply on the glosses and examples we have, not an explicit description. That would mean you bach a naQjejHom. On the other hand, since naQjejHommey are not a native Klingon invention, Klingons might not have a strong preference for which word to use, and its association with naQjejmey, which you chuH, might lead them to say that you chuH a naQjejHom. If you want anything more definitive, you'll probably have to go ask a Klingon.