Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Is the {telDaq wovmoHwI'} legal
5 Dec
2016
5 Dec
'16
7:06 a.m.
As mentioned before in this list, it can be analysed as {[telDaq wovmoH]wI'}, so it is perfectly legal. P.S. To avoid confusion: {mayqel qunenoS} and I are different persons.
5 Dec
5 Dec
7:38 a.m.
New subject: Is the {telDaq wovmoHwI'} legal
On 12/5/2016 7:06 AM, Michael Kúnin wrote:
As mentioned before in this list, it can be analysed as {[telDaq wovmoH]wI'}, so it is perfectly legal.
I don't think you can apply *-wI'* to a multi-word phrase. Anyway, Okrand has consistently used *wovmoHwI'* as /light,/ so it seems a fixed meaning to me. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
3510
Age (days ago)
3510
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Michael Kúnin -
SuStel