tu'lu' prefix with countable nouns
First, lets take a walk down memory lane.. Recently, lieven revealed, that okrand revealed, that maltz had revealed.. *** revelation start *** Regarding the problem we recently had with {'ar}, Okrand answered: Plural if the questioned noun can be singular or plural (it lacks a plural suffix) and the translation is “how many?”; singular if the questioned noun is something that can’t be counted and the translation is “how much?” So {Duj ’ar DIlegh?} “How many ships do we see?” {bIQ ’ar wIlegh?} “How much water do we see? *** revelation end *** So, here comes the question.. I want to say: "how many ships are there ?" Do I say {Duj 'ar tu'lu' ?} ? Or do I say {Duj 'ar lutu'lu'} ? Does the new insight on {'ar}, "outweight" the "pedantic" flavor of the {lutu'lu'} ? Or is our beloved {tu'lu'} too tough a nut to crack, even for the newly revealed {'ar} knowledge, thus being able to survive it ? ~ bara'qa'
On 12/9/2019 9:14 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
I want to say: "how many ships are there ?"
Do I say {Duj 'ar tu'lu' ?} ?
Or do I say {Duj 'ar lutu'lu'} ?
Does the new insight on {'ar}, "outweight" the "pedantic" flavor of the {lutu'lu'} ?
Or is our beloved {tu'lu'} too tough a nut to crack, even for the newly revealed {'ar} knowledge, thus being able to survive it ?
*Duj 'ar tu'lu'?* *tu'lu'* doesn't "outweigh" the new rule. When you use *tu'lu',* you don't conjugate, so the issue never arises. Before we got the new rule, using *tu'lu'* was one of the few safe ways we could deal with the *'ar* plurality question, because *tu'lu'* ignores plurality. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
participants (2)
-
mayqel qunen'oS -
SuStel