meaning of the verbs {tob} and {Daj}
I think I just realized that years now, I understand wrongly the verbs {tob} and {Daj}. But before I start, just to be on the same page (as americans say), here are the definitions: tob (v) test conclusively, prove Daj (v) test inconclusively Suppose I write the following sentences: nger vItobpu' nger vIDajpu' Years now, I thought that the {nger vItobpu'} means "I proved that the theory is correct", and that the {nger vIDajpu'} means "I proved that the theory is wrong". But now I realized that the meanings are rather the folllowing: nger vItobpu' I tested conclusively the theory (I say that I tested it thoroughly, but without this meaning that the theory is necessarily correct; after the "testing" finished, perhaps the conclusion was that the theory was perfectly wrong) nger vIDajpu' I tested inconclusively the theory (I just say that I didn't thoroughly test the theory; it may be a valid theory, or it may be a wrong one, but the "testing" wasn't thorough/effective enough to come to definite conclusion) Is my understanding correct? ~ Dana'an
On 6/25/2021 8:18 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
I think I just realized that years now, I understand wrongly the verbs {tob} and {Daj}. But before I start, just to be on the same page (as americans say), here are the definitions:
tob (v) test conclusively, prove Daj (v) test inconclusively
Suppose I write the following sentences:
nger vItobpu' nger vIDajpu'
Years now, I thought that the {nger vItobpu'} means "I proved that the theory is correct", and that the {nger vIDajpu'} means "I proved that the theory is wrong".
But now I realized that the meanings are rather the folllowing:
nger vItobpu' I tested conclusively the theory
(I say that I tested it thoroughly, but without this meaning that the theory is necessarily correct; after the "testing" finished, perhaps the conclusion was that the theory was perfectly wrong)
nger vIDajpu' I tested inconclusively the theory
(I just say that I didn't thoroughly test the theory; it may be a valid theory, or it may be a wrong one, but the "testing" wasn't thorough/effective enough to come to definite conclusion)
Is my understanding correct?
Mostly. I think the word /prove/ in the gloss suggests that *tob* implies not only that the test was conclusive, but that it was also positive. If you *tob* something, you conclusively show that it is correct. To test something conclusively and show that it is wrong, use *tobHa'*/disprove./ *nger vItobpu'*//I tested the theory and showed conclusively that it is correct. *nger vItobHa'pu'* I tested the theory and showed conclusively that it is incorrect. *nger vIDajpu'* I tested the theory but was unable to conclusively show its validity. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
jIH:
nger vIDajpu' SuStel: I tested the theory but was unable to conclusively show its validity.
There's something which confuses me here; does this sentence say that "the testing process was carried out (as it was meant to be carried out) but in the end nothing was proven conclusively", or does it say "nothing was proven conclusively because the testing process wasn't in the end (for whatever reason) carried out in its' entirety as intended"? ~ Dana'an
On 6/25/2021 10:12 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
jIH:
nger vIDajpu' SuStel: I tested the theory but was unable to conclusively show its validity. There's something which confuses me here; does this sentence say that "the testing process was carried out (as it was meant to be carried out) but in the end nothing was proven conclusively", or does it say "nothing was proven conclusively because the testing process wasn't in the end (for whatever reason) carried out in its' entirety as intended"?
It doesn't say either. It says testing occurred but no conclusion was reached. It doesn't attribute the lack of a conclusion to anything, and it doesn't say whether the testing was completed or done correctly. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
My hunch is that {tob} could mean "test positive" as in "The patient tested positive for the COVID-19 virus" though I'm not sure of the exact phrasing. Something like {SID luchov Qelpu'; qo'vID wa'maH Hut javtIm toblu'} perhaps? In any event, here's how Okrand -- as well as Lieven and Qov in DISCOVERY - have used the various "testing" verbs: tob test conclusively, prove (v) (KGT 69): One accepts a challenge ... in order to prove one's honor ({quv tob} [literally, "test honor conclusively"])" in a duel. logh veQDaq bachchugh, yoH 'e' toblaHbe' SuvwI' Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle. (ST5 notes) SuvwI' qa' patlh veb chavlaHmeH tlhIngan lo'chu' chaH. toDujDaj toblu'. [They] use the devices [painstiks] to inflict pain in a manner which will allow the Klingon to attain a higher state of spirituality as a warrior, proving his mettle. S32 Daj test inconclusively (v) vaj toDuj Daj ngeHbej DI vI' Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle. ST5/TKW ("Sharpshooting of the cosmos' litter inconclusively tests a warrior's courage.") [This is a notorious back-fit of a dittography in the ST5 shooting script!] chov assess, evaluate, test (v) luchovmeH 'oy'naQmey lo' [Warriors] who test him with painstiks. S9 tlhIngan wo' yuQmey chovlu'chugh Qo'noS potlh law' Hoch potlh puS. The principal planet of the Klingon Empire, Qo'noS... S27 waH taste, try out (e.g. food), test, use experimentally (v) (KGT 86): The verb {mum} (taste) means "sense flavors". To say {Soj vImum} ("I taste the food") is to say "I perceive a flavor or flavors", not "I try out the food to see if it is prepared properly". This latter meaning of taste is expressed by the verb {waH}, which can also be used more generally to mean "try out, test, use experimentally". qagh vIwaH I taste the gagh. ("I try out the gagh [to see how it tastes]") (st.klingon) 'ol verify; check if/make sure that (something) is true (v) (qepHom 2017 < DSC) yIvoq 'ach yI'ol Trust, but verify. TKW narghpu'pa' Human cham HoSghaj ghaj DISqa'vI'rIy 'e' 'ol ghaH. Before her escape, the human confirmed that Discovery possesses a powerful technology. (DSC/Qov "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum") woq confirm, substantiate, corroborate (v) (qepHom 2017 < DSC) De'wI', yIwoq! Computer, confirm! (DSC/LLL "Magic to Make the Sanest Man Go Mad") ghot woqlu'. Identity confirmed. (DSC/LLL "Magic to Make the Sanest Man Go Mad") (Lieven, 11/17/2017): Okrand explained the difference saying that {'ol} is used to check a fact, but {woq} is to confirm it. -- Voragh ----------------------------------------Original Message---------------------------------------- From: SuStel On 6/25/2021 8:18 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote: I think I just realized that years now, I understand wrongly the verbs {tob} and {Daj}. But before I start, just to be on the same page (as americans say), here are the definitions: tob (v) test conclusively, prove Daj (v) test inconclusively Suppose I write the following sentences: nger vItobpu' nger vIDajpu' Years now, I thought that the {nger vItobpu'} means "I proved that the theory is correct", and that the {nger vIDajpu'} means "I proved that the theory is wrong". But now I realized that the meanings are rather the folllowing: nger vItobpu' I tested conclusively the theory (I say that I tested it thoroughly, but without this meaning that the theory is necessarily correct; after the "testing" finished, perhaps the conclusion was that the theory was perfectly wrong) nger vIDajpu' I tested inconclusively the theory (I just say that I didn't thoroughly test the theory; it may be a valid theory, or it may be a wrong one, but the "testing" wasn't thorough/effective enough to come to definite conclusion) Is my understanding correct? Mostly. I think the word prove in the gloss suggests that tob implies not only that the test was conclusive, but that it was also positive. If you tob something, you conclusively show that it is correct. To test something conclusively and show that it is wrong, use tobHa' disprove. nger vItobpu' I tested the theory and showed conclusively that it is correct. nger vItobHa'pu' I tested the theory and showed conclusively that it is incorrect. nger vIDajpu' I tested the theory but was unable to conclusively show its validity. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
chov assess, evaluate, test (v) luchovmeH 'oy'naQmey lo' [Warriors] who test him with painstiks. S9 tlhIngan wo' yuQmey chovlu'chugh Qo'noS potlh law' Hoch potlh puS. The principal planet of the Klingon Empire, Qo'noS... S27
These are very interesting examples with regards to the verb {chov}. I don't know why, but I was under the impression that the {chov} is used only to say things like {juH vIchov} as in "I evaluate the house" as in "I asign a price". However, this now raises the question; can we indeed use the {chov} to say things like "I calculate the price of something"? ~ Dana'an
On 6/25/2021 11:00 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
chov assess, evaluate, test (v) luchovmeH 'oy'naQmey lo' [Warriors] who test him with painstiks. S9 tlhIngan wo' yuQmey chovlu'chugh Qo'noS potlh law' Hoch potlh puS. The principal planet of the Klingon Empire, Qo'noS... S27
These are very interesting examples with regards to the verb {chov}.
I don't know why, but I was under the impression that the {chov} is used only to say things like {juH vIchov} as in "I evaluate the house" as in "I asign a price".
However, this now raises the question; can we indeed use the {chov} to say things like "I calculate the price of something"?
No. Evaluation is not the same as calculation. Evaluation is a judgment based on evidence. A calculation is a computation. There is some overlap, but they don't mean the same thing. *SuvwI' Duj vIchov*/I evaluate the warrior's ship/ (Is it good? What are its capabilities? Can it defeat a starship in battle?) *SuvwI' Duj Do vISIm*/I calculate the warrior's ship's velocity/ (and come up with a number like a warp factor) -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 16:42, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
My hunch is that {tob} could mean "test positive" as in "The patient tested positive for the COVID-19 virus" though I'm not sure of the exact phrasing. Something like {SID luchov Qelpu'; qo'vID wa'maH Hut javtIm toblu'} perhaps?
I'm not so sure about that. Given that the canon usages of this verb have as its object {quv}, {toDuj}, and {yoH 'e'}, it seems that the verb is about putting someone or something to the test, to conclusively demonstrate that it has some given characteristic (the object). I'm more inclined to believe that it might be used for a vaccine: {HutmaH Hut vatlhvI' Qap javtIm raS'IS 'e' toblu'pu'} "the vaccine has been proven 99% effective". -- De'vID
participants (4)
-
De'vID -
mayqel qunen'oS -
Steven Boozer -
SuStel