Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Quj: mu'mey chu' tI'aq!
Am 17.07.2024 um 01:50 schrieb James Landau via tlhIngan-Hol:
With the qep'a' wejmaH wa'DIch in only 9 days, I thought it would be fun to try to predict the new words that Marc Okrand will give up from the chabal tetlh. These are my guesses; some of them I wasn't inspired enough to even try on.
I see no point in guessing the results of new words and strongly discourage sending such a list full of non-canon words. It has happened before that someone didn't read the entire message and accidentally assumed it was a new word. This is more confusing than helpful. -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" https://tlhInganHol.com https://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland
> to try to predict the new words that Marc Okrand will give up from the= <br> > chabal tetlh. These are my guesses; some of them I wasn't inspired= <br> > enough to even try on.<br> <br> I see no point in guessing the results of new words and strongly<br> discourage sending such a list full of non-canon words. It has happened<br> before that someone didn't read the entire message and accidentally<br> assumed it was a new word. This is more confusing than helpful.<br> </blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all"><div>I concur. Made-up words should no= t be posted, especially in list form where the list may be partially quoted= without context. There's already one message replying to the above pse= udo-words where the quoted passage doesn't make it clear the quote isn&= #39;t about a real word.</div><div><br></div><span class=3D"gmail_signature= _prefix">-- </span><br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">De'vI= D</div></div>
participants (2)
-
De'vID -
Lieven L. Litaer