jISIv.. qa'vIn tu'lu'choHpu'pa', chay' vemlaH nuvpu' ? qa'vIn Sormey chenmoHta'mo' christ, wItlho'jaj ! qa'vIn tu'lu'be' net jalchugh, ghe''orna' 'oH qo'vam'e'. Soj vISaHchu'be'.. 'a qa'vInwIj tlhapchugh vay', vaj jIghobqangchu'. ~ Qa'yIn
On Aug 2, 2020, at 8:33 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
qa'vIn tu'lu'choHpu'pa', chay' vemlaH nuvpu' ?
jaS jIghel jIH: tlhoy wIbmo' qa'vIn, lutlhutlh nuv, chay' 'e' lucherghlaH? qatlh 'opvaD HerghHey 'ut mojpu' 'enteDvam 'up? ngab Hoch qa'vIn qurgh lIngbogh lav net jalchugh, jIbepbe'. -- ghunchu'wI'
ghunchu'wI':
jaS jIghel jIH: tlhoy wIbmo' qa'vIn, lutlhutlh
nuv, chay' 'e' lucherghlaH?
taQ wanI'vam 'e' vISov, 'ej wanI'vam QIjlaHbe' vay'. yInwIj DIS wa'maH chorghDIch vISIQchoHpu'DI', qa'vIn vItlhutlhchoHpu'. qaStaHvIS DISmey veb, reH qa'vInwIjDaq Su'ghar vIcheltaH. 'a ghIq, pay' Su'ghar qa'vIn vImuSqu'choHpu'. ngugh, meqvammo', qa'vInwIjDaq Su'ghar vIchelbe'choHpu'.. 'ej DaH qa'vInvam wIbqu' vIQejchu'. ghunchu'wI':
qatlh 'opvaD HerghHey 'ut mojpu'
'enteDvam 'up?
'eqtaHvIS qoj paSchoHtaHvIS, HaDnISmo' qoj vumnISmo' 'opvam.. ghunchu'wI:
ngab Hoch qa'vIn qurgh lIngbogh lav net
jalchugh, jIbepbe'.
not ngab.. Saghan law'qu' malja' 'oHmo' qa'vIn malja''e', not ngab qa'vIn Sormey. Sormeyvam QanmeH, Hoch qaSmoH corporations. Do'Ha', Huch 'oHmo' qo'vam Qun'e', qa'vIn Saghanmey weS corporations 'e' luchaw'be' qum. ~ Qa'yIn
jIH:
qa'vIn Saghanmey weS corporations 'e' luchaw'be' qum.
As soon as I pressed "send", it came to me that there was something which didn't feel right with regards to the {Saghanmey}. So I searched my notes, and there I found that in the past there was this thread: http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2019-June/011937.html With all of its' individual messages found on this page: http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2019-June/thread.html After reading this thread again, I realized that in the sentence {qa'vIn Saghanmey weS corporations 'e' luchaw'be' qum}, the {Saghanmey} obviously wasn't the best choice. So, instead of this:
qa'vIn Saghanmey weS corporations 'e' luchaw'be' qum
I should have written instead:
qa'vIn Saghan law' weS corporations 'e' luchaw'be' qum
Oh well.. (some klingon replacement honor crap goes here..) ~ Qa'yIn
And I just found out that there's Ca'Non on this matter too.. If someone goes here: http://klingon.wiki/En/NewWordsQepHom2019 Then he will read that at the 2019 qepHom, it was clarified that: "In paq'batlh, SaD law' was used to say "thousands". You can not say SaDmey or vatlhmey etc." ~ Qa'yIn
participants (2)
-
Alan Anderson -
mayqel qunen'oS