Many many years ago, Lawrence gave an interview and mentione dthere were about "30-40 fluent speakers". This is quoted everywehere in the web, also in Arika Okrants book. That interview is quite old, and the number of speakers has with no doubt increased. But Wikipedia is no asking for a citation. As of today, I would guess there are about 100 people who speak Klingon fluently, but my number is based on experience, not statistics. So, in which way could we get a good number of fluent speakers? (PS: no need to discuss what "fluent" really means. There are no native level speakers.) -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" https://tlhInganHol.com https://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 9:09 AM Lieven L. Litaer via tlhIngan-Hol < tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org> wrote:
Many many years ago, Lawrence gave an interview and mentione dthere were about "30-40 fluent speakers". This is quoted everywehere in the web, also in Arika Okrants book.
That interview is quite old, and the number of speakers has with no doubt increased.
But Wikipedia is no asking for a citation.
As of today, I would guess there are about 100 people who speak Klingon fluently, but my number is based on experience, not statistics. So, in which way could we get a good number of fluent speakers?
(PS: no need to discuss what "fluent" really means. There are no native level speakers.)
I'm not sure how one can go about counting "fluent" speakers without defining what "fluent" means in this specific context. I think one also has to count "speakers" and "readers/writers" separately. I think the number of people who *speak* the language remains quite small. I think the number of people who can *read* and *write* the language is considerably larger, due to programs like Duolingo. But those are just my perceptions, and data may contradict me. Another consideration is whether to count people who have been "fluent" in the past, but are no longer. It may be that as new learners gain fluency, older members of the community drop out and so the overall count of current fluent speakers remains roughly the same. -- De'vID
You are certainly right, it must be clear what a "fluent" speaker is. But it feels like Lawrence did not make that clear in his first interview when he made that statement. In my opinion, a fluent speaker does not mean to be perfect or know each word from the book. I regard fluent in a way that one can have a basic conversation about general topics, and one is capable of understanding an explanation of an unknown word. Talking more technical (only for Klingon): Basics of grammar should be understood by 80% and the knowledge of vocabulary should be above 60%, excluding specialized vocabulary. (most fluent speakers of English probably have never heard of puffins, so why should a Klingon speaker know the definition of a neSngech?) Although it's interesting, I think that for the common knowledge of "the world", it is not important to make a difference between "speaking fluency" and "writing fluency". After all, it's very difficult to test that. I have encountered people with whom I could communicate in Klingon in a real life speed written chat, but speaking in person was very difficult. Still I see those as fluent speakers. Talking numbers: The Facebook group tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'pu' has almost 100 members. I suppose most of them do speak Klingon at least a little. Learn Klingon has 3,000 members, but those are learners. Are there no other ways to find an official number of Klingon speakers? -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" https://tlhInganHol.com https://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland
I think that no one can have a good answer unless they know what the data is for. My peak fluency came during an emotional conversation between myself, Qov, and Seqram (whom my English-based spell checker wants to rename Seagram), decades ago, where Qov expressed self-doubt and was reassured by the other two of us, with no temptation to break out of Klingon because of the emotional importance of the conversation. We all knew that the language could bear the weight. I enjoyed being in the audience as Krankor and Seqram performed… I think it was called {baHwI’ ‘Iv?}, their version of “Who’s On First”, describing a ship’s crew, the members of whom all had names homophonic to question words. It was hilarious and exhilarating to watch the recognition of the long, long joke wash across the faces of the audience. Singing in the Klingon barbershop quartet… I’m sure there hasn't been another, such that one might be pressed to ask, “Which Klingon barbershop quartet”… was a highlight of my life. Meanwhile, you can’t take meaningful statistics if you don’t know the point the statistics is trying to make. Who wants to know this, and towards what end? For me, the whole point of the Klingon language, is that it is living proof that anything can happen. There are a long string of things one would never have expected to happen that happened because Dr. Marc Okrand bumped into a friend from Paramount while waiting for something to happen while setting up for a live sub-captioning of an awards ceremony for TV all those years ago. Someone should write a series of novels fictionalizing these highly unanticipated series of events. I mean, Agatha Cristy made a long career out of stories about British people killing one another and lying in futile attempts to dodge the consequences of their actions. The Klingon novels would be MUCH more interesting. pItlh charghwI’ ‘utlh (ghaH, ghaH, -Daj)
On Jul 15, 2024, at 7:02 AM, Lieven L. Litaer via tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org> wrote:
You are certainly right, it must be clear what a "fluent" speaker is. But it feels like Lawrence did not make that clear in his first interview when he made that statement.
In my opinion, a fluent speaker does not mean to be perfect or know each word from the book. I regard fluent in a way that one can have a basic conversation about general topics, and one is capable of understanding an explanation of an unknown word. Talking more technical (only for Klingon): Basics of grammar should be understood by 80% and the knowledge of vocabulary should be above 60%, excluding specialized vocabulary. (most fluent speakers of English probably have never heard of puffins, so why should a Klingon speaker know the definition of a neSngech?)
Although it's interesting, I think that for the common knowledge of "the world", it is not important to make a difference between "speaking fluency" and "writing fluency". After all, it's very difficult to test that. I have encountered people with whom I could communicate in Klingon in a real life speed written chat, but speaking in person was very difficult. Still I see those as fluent speakers.
Talking numbers: The Facebook group tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'pu' has almost 100 members. I suppose most of them do speak Klingon at least a little. Learn Klingon has 3,000 members, but those are learners.
Are there no other ways to find an official number of Klingon speakers?
--
Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" https://tlhInganHol.com https://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
About a year ago or so, when I was a bit more active on the KLI Discord server, I created a map of Klingon speakers, so as to know where most of them are concentrated. I asked a lot of people on Discord what cities they live in and also took some info from the Klingon language wiki. I also either estimated people's level of Klingon myself or took their KLCP level, putting people in 4 categories: "unknown", "beginner", "intermediate", "advanced" (the latter of which is a bit broader than 'fluent', but my own personal rule of thumb was, if the person has either KLCP 3 or can talk really freely and (almost) naturally on the Discord video chat, then it's 'fluent' enough to be advanced). A very rough definition to go by... Ah, and for "beginner" I didn't count total beginners, but those who already have a small understanding and can speak or write basic (understandable) Klingon. For privacy reasons I don't think it's a good idea to share the link to the map itself, so it's private. But it can serve as a rough guide of how many more-or-less fluent more-or-less active speakers were around. Of course, by now some might have lost their fluency, but others might have become more fluent. And I'm sure I didn't catch all the speakers. I counted, and have 40 people in the "fluent" category, I could imagine there's perhaps 10 or so more of them that I didn't know about. So perhaps 40 to 50 is a good, rough estimate? 19 people are in the "intermediate" category. So you could say that thus there are about 60 people (in my list!) you could actually have a meaningful, longer live conversation with, only in Klingon. Again, maybe there are 20 or so more people, so perhaps 80+ people who can actually speak Klingon "quite well"? And 36 people are in the "beginner" category. Here, surely there are many more, thanks to Duolingo. Since I often get the question about the number of speakers, I tell people that it's hard to say but that there are maybe around 60 fluent speakers in the world, and that it's very hard to say how many people "speak" Klingon in any meaningful sense of the word, but "perhaps a few hundred". I think at least the part about 40 to 60 more-or-less fluent speakers sounds quite credible, doesn't it, given the quite vague definition. That's my 2 darsek, — André aka Vortarulo Am Mo., 15. Juli 2024 um 23:59 Uhr schrieb Will Martin via tlhIngan-Hol < tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org>:
I think that no one can have a good answer unless they know what the data is for.
My peak fluency came during an emotional conversation between myself, Qov, and Seqram (whom my English-based spell checker wants to rename Seagram), decades ago, where Qov expressed self-doubt and was reassured by the other two of us, with no temptation to break out of Klingon because of the emotional importance of the conversation. We all knew that the language could bear the weight.
I enjoyed being in the audience as Krankor and Seqram performed… I think it was called {baHwI’ ‘Iv?}, their version of “Who’s On First”, describing a ship’s crew, the members of whom all had names homophonic to question words. It was hilarious and exhilarating to watch the recognition of the long, long joke wash across the faces of the audience.
Singing in the Klingon barbershop quartet… I’m sure there hasn't been another, such that one might be pressed to ask, “Which Klingon barbershop quartet”… was a highlight of my life.
Meanwhile, you can’t take meaningful statistics if you don’t know the point the statistics is trying to make. Who wants to know this, and towards what end?
For me, the whole point of the Klingon language, is that it is living proof that anything can happen. There are a long string of things one would never have expected to happen that happened because Dr. Marc Okrand bumped into a friend from Paramount while waiting for something to happen while setting up for a live sub-captioning of an awards ceremony for TV all those years ago.
Someone should write a series of novels fictionalizing these highly unanticipated series of events.
I mean, Agatha Cristy made a long career out of stories about British people killing one another and lying in futile attempts to dodge the consequences of their actions. The Klingon novels would be MUCH more interesting.
pItlh
charghwI’ ‘utlh (ghaH, ghaH, -Daj)
On Jul 15, 2024, at 7:02 AM, Lieven L. Litaer via tlhIngan-Hol < tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org> wrote:
You are certainly right, it must be clear what a "fluent" speaker is. But it feels like Lawrence did not make that clear in his first interview when he made that statement.
In my opinion, a fluent speaker does not mean to be perfect or know each word from the book. I regard fluent in a way that one can have a basic conversation about general topics, and one is capable of understanding an explanation of an unknown word. Talking more technical (only for Klingon): Basics of grammar should be understood by 80% and the knowledge of vocabulary should be above 60%, excluding specialized vocabulary. (most fluent speakers of English probably have never heard of puffins, so why should a Klingon speaker know the definition of a neSngech?)
Although it's interesting, I think that for the common knowledge of "the world", it is not important to make a difference between "speaking fluency" and "writing fluency". After all, it's very difficult to test that. I have encountered people with whom I could communicate in Klingon in a real life speed written chat, but speaking in person was very difficult. Still I see those as fluent speakers.
Talking numbers: The Facebook group tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'pu' has almost 100 members. I suppose most of them do speak Klingon at least a little. Learn Klingon has 3,000 members, but those are learners.
Are there no other ways to find an official number of Klingon speakers?
--
Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" https://tlhInganHol.com https://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
participants (4)
-
André Müller -
De'vID -
Lieven L. Litaer -
Will Martin