On 22 February 2017 at 00:55, Brian Cote <wearetheinformation00@gmail.com> wrote:

DaHjaj <<paq'batlh>> vIlaDqa' 'ej mu'tlheghvam vItu':

"quv vuv nuv pagh ghajbogh neH" /Honor is for those with nothing to loose!/ (paq'raD 19:15)

muj mu'tlheghvam pab 'e' vIHar, qar'a'?

I think it's an instance of apposition... maybe. It's probably just bending the rules to get the rhyming pattern of {quv vuv nuv}.

vaj vIlughmoH 'ej mu'tlheghvam vIlIng:

"quv vuv pagh ghajbogh neH nuv'e'"

I think the {neH} should follow {nuv}, in the meaning that you want. You want to say "only someone who has nothing" not "someone who merely has nothing". -- De'vID