SuStel:
> But what if you're the one upon whom
> conditions have been placed? What if you're a
> third party who is neither imposer or
> imposee?
I would have to read specific examples for each of these two possibilities, in order to specify further how I would proceed.
But if I try to approach these possibilities in general (and if I understand correctly what each of them describes), then:
for the
> if you're the one upon whom
> conditions have been placed?
I would describe the event from the view of him who imposes these conditions, and use the imperative.
and for the
>if you're a third party who is neither imposer or
> imposee?
I would have to see a specific example in order to reply; all I can think of now is describing the event from the imposee point of view by the use of imperative.
do you have in mind specific examples for each one of these two possibilities ?
qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
On 11/24/2016 5:57 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
What does the "must' express, if not an imperative of sorts ? When I
say "you need to do this", often I mean "you must do this"
Yes, that's what I've been trying to say about that.
I could write:
{tlhIngan Hol DaghItlhmeH Hol nov DamughtaHvIS, Hol nov qa'
yIchenqa'moH}. and then, if it is necessary I could add a {'ut}, a
{net poQ} or whatever else (although I think that they rarely would
be).
If you're the one imposing something on someone else, yes, you can do this. But what if you're the one upon whom conditions have been placed? What if you're a third party who is neither imposer or imposee?
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org