To answer the remainder of your original question, I pulled {paqvaD qanejmoH} off of the "klingon_grammar" page on the Wikipedia. However there was no citation given for where the example of this particular construction came from.
On 1/15/2017 9:34 PM, Brian Cote wrote:
ej vaj ghaH QeHqu'moH qechna'vam 'ej bI'reS Qu'DajvaDghaH parqu'moH.
Disregarding your suggestions for recasting these sentencesfor the moment.
{bI'reS} - I was intending to use it as a time stamp, as inthe {paq'batlh}, however, I'm thinking {wa'DIch} might havebeen more appropriate here.
wa'DIch would have been better. A bI'reS is the beginning of some artistic performance, not a job.
{Qu'DajvaD ghaH parqu'moH} - I'll explain my thinking here.I was intending to write /(this idea specifically) caused him toreally dislike his duty/. I based this on the example of{paqvaD qanejmoH}, but as I'm currently writing this,I'm realizing that this probably falls under the category ofthe "prefix trick", correct? I was thinking that {ghaH} would bethe explicit direct object and {Qu'Daj} would be the explicitindirect object. This obviously didn't work, correct?
Does paqvaD qanejmoH appear in paq'batlh? I have only about two-thirds of it typed in and searchable, and what I have already done doesn't contain that phrase.
Our first example of how to do this was on a SkyBox card, where the phrase was ghaHvaD quHDaq qawmoH it causes him to remember his heritage. Following this pattern, your desired sentence would be ghaHvaD Qu'Daj parqu'moH it causes him to really dislike his task.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name