Thanks for the suggestion!

I was a bit hesitant about -ghach because I remember a discussion about it being a bit tricky to use for a beginner, or possibly "bad Klingon".

But, I guess then if it's ok to use it it could be:

vuttaHghach vIparHa'

(by the way, I don't need to use any prefix in a nominalized verb, right?)

Thanks again!

~mughwI'



2017-02-12 23:08 GMT+01:00 MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com>:
How about using a noun derived from a verb (by adding -ghach, e.g.) as the object? It involves deciding which other suffix(es) to use so that it doesn't sound odd. 

lay'tel SIvten

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
Okay, since others have broken the KLBC-barrier already, and our current BG may be at shore leave, I'll answer this:

Am 09.02.2017 um 13:31 schrieb Aurélie Demonchaux:
We have some examples of <par> and <parHa'> being used with nouns or
pronouns but I can't find any canon source where they apply to verbs.

Do you use {'e'} or nothing in those cases?

I will not go into alternatives like {tIv} "enjoy", but simple answer
the question grammatically:

The verb {neH} is the only exception for omitting {'e'}. This means that it is correct to say

{jIvut 'e' vIparHa'} "I like that I cook."

Yes, indeed you may think that this literally means "I do like the fact that I am cooking at this moment", but there is no "special" construction to express the common feeling of "I like surfing in general". It's the English that's strange, not the Klingon.


--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org


_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org