On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:07 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:Yep, it would be convenient. But they're verbs, and that's how the language works. Find a way around it.
A phrase like vungbogh SuS'a' or vungbogh muD is a way around it.
Very good! So does vungbogh muD refer to only that section of the atmosphere that is hurricaning? When one says SIS muD, one is not talking about the part of the atmosphere that is raining as a thing discrete from the rest. Does only a SuS'a' do vung, or can an ordinary SuS vung as well? Can the SuS do SIS?
Just to remind us all...
It rained a few times during the weekend, so we were put into the situation to discuss it.SIS SISqu' SIStaH SISchoH All correct. SISlu', altho grammaticlly correct, he didn't particularly like. Someone COULD use it but to me it sounds like they skipped science class and don't know what the subject is. You can also give it an object and say things like the clouds rained down cats and dogs. ...or something like that; you get the idea. But when Marc and I went outside and drops of water were falling on us, he looked up and simply said "SIS".Do you think we can say SuS vung muD? We can say pey SIS it rained acid, as per the above. And if we can, can we also still say vung SuS?
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name