Lets say I write: {vIghro'mey legh} for "they see the cats".
maj..
Alternatively, I can write {vIghro'mey legh chaH}, for the same meaning.
maj again..
Often I read, that by writing the {chaH} too, I'm placing emphasis on who it is who sees the cats; i.e. I'm actually saying:
"THEY see the cats".
Which is something I can't understand, since I always thought, that if I want to emphasize the {chaH} I would use the emphatic {-'e'}, as such:
{vIghro'mey legh chaH'e'}
So, I would like to ask..
Why if I write {vIghro'mey legh chaH}, without adding the {-'e'} on {chaH}, I'm actually emphasizing it ? (the {chaH} I mean).
Can't I just be writing the {chaH}, in order to specify that it is "they" who see the cats instead of "him/her/it" ?
Is this "emphatic" interpretation of {chaH} Ca'NoN or something ?
~ mayqel qunen'oS