jIH:

> Qo'noSDaq nujaHmoH chaH

> maHvaD Qo'noS lujaHmoH

SuStel:

> Yes. You could also say the latter as Qo'noS nujaHmoH via the prefix trick.

hmm.. This confuses me. I thought that by saying {Qo'noS nujaHmoH}, the meaning would be that "the going takes place on Kronos', instead of "we are being caused to go to Kronos".

The direct object of the word jaH is inherently locative. Any direct object you give to it will be interpreted in a locative sense. The direct object of jaH is the destination the subject is going to.

Qo'noS lujaH They go to Kronos.

Any other locatives that may be added in front of jaH do not necessarily imply the destination of the going, since locatives in Klingon can mean on, in, at, or even by. It's not impossible to interpret a non-object locative in front of jaH as the destination, but it generally won't be interpreted that way, since that's what the object is for.

DujDaq jaH chaH They go on the ship.
DujDaq Qo'noS lujaH They go to Kronos on the ship.

It's all about whether the locative is the direct object or not. If it is, it's the destination. If it isn't, it's not the destination.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name