On Oct 26, 2017 23:33, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 1, 2017 00:50, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:

On 28 September 2017 at 19:06, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
magh indicate, reveal (v)

What do you have as the source of this definition? I am trying to verify this definition.

Anyone? I'm almost convinced that this is an error (or perhaps a trap, since the TKD definition of {magh} is "betray"). My notes claim it's a possible typo, with the source as Star Trek: Communicator. However, the text I have of STC issue #104, which is the only issue I'm aware of where new vocabulary was revealed, does not have this listed.

What is the origin of this definition?

Curiously, the KLI new words list have {magh} listed as "betray", but with the origin given as "MSN and HolQeD v5n3p15 - S26".

https://www.kli.org/about-klingon/new-klingon-words/m/

Indeed, the word is *used* in SkyBox card 26, the content of which is printed in HolQeD 5:3. But I checked TKD and this isn't a new word. It's in TKD (and not the Addendum).

Did someone deliberately introduce an error in the KLI new words list (using the word {magh} "betray") to catch copiers? If so, naughty naughty.

De'vID