On 7/20/2016 11:40 AM, André Müller wrote:
2016-07-20 17:31 GMT+02:00 Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>:

  jagh yIjeymeH ‘ej nIteb yISuvrup!

 

 HIq yISammeH!  tach yI'el!


I wouldn't judge these as grammatically well-formed Klingon sentences. It feels like trying to use 2 aspects for the same verb. You'd have to decide, either imperative, or a purposive subclause. Both doesn't work.

I think that's what he meant to do, but forgot to remove the -meH from each. For the sentences to make sense, you'd also have to reverse the order of the clauses:

nIteb yISuv 'ej jagh yIjey

tach yI'el 'ej HIq yISam

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name