Sorry; is there a rule against directly:?
wa' Human nen yoH
one brave adult human

But I suppose that it could also mean:
wa' may mean:-
- I:1
Human may mean:-
- N:human
nen may mean:-
- V:be_mature/adult=
- N:[growth|maturation|maturity]=
yoH may mean:-
- V:be_brave

one human's brave maturity

----Original message----
From : sustel@trimboli.name
Date : 22/09/2017 - 14:16 (GMTST)
To : tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
Subject : Re: [tlhIngan Hol] One dog or five cats ?

On 9/22/2017 9:14 AM, SuStel wrote:

On 9/22/2017 9:09 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:

ok, I understand. However, if one wrote {nenbogh 'ej yoHbogh wa' Human}, then that would be correct too, right ?

There's nothing technically wrong with it. However, it violates my sense of adjective order. We're not dealing exactly with adjectives here, but the effect is the same.

Mind you, that's an English rule. There's no guarantee that Klingons have anything like it. Given their strictly ordered suffixes and word order, however, I wouldn't be surprised if there were such a thing.
-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name