But he isn’t doing that. This isn’t a chain of SAOs; it’s two independent SAOs. It’s not “the dog knows that you have a disruptor that you see it.” It’s “the dog knows that you see it. The dog also knows that you have a disruptor.”

As for the actual question in the original post, qatlh muSujnIS ghu'vam? 

On May 30, 2019, at 09:03, Will Martin <willmartin2@mac.com> wrote:

Just so you know, there are some who would argue that you can’t have two different {‘e’} pronouns pointing back to the same previous sentence. I’m sure there are also some who think this is fine. I’m not telling you what you can’t do. I’m just suggesting that this might not be as normal and unexceptional as you think it is.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.




On May 29, 2019, at 12:41 PM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

jIlIj..
I forgot..

DaleghlaH; 'e' Sov *dog*vam, nISwI' Daghaj; 'e' Sov je *dog*vam, 'a
SaHbe' 'ej mevbe'..
the dog knows that you see it, and it knows that you have a disruptor
too, but it doesn't care, and it refuses to stop..

~ m. qunen'oS
these are the questions that really matter
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org