The handout from qep'a' 23 just uses {'op ret} and {'op pIq}, without any further explanations or examples involving explicit time units: https://www.kli.org/activities/qepmey/past-qepamey/qepa-chamah-wejdich/new-words/ I think we can assume they're fine as-is. You don't really need to specify a time period because you're not being specific about how many of those periods there are anyway.



On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:19 AM SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 10/17/2018 8:41 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> Can we say just {'op ret}, or do we necessarily need to write some
> kind of time period right after the {'op} e.g. {'op tup ret} ?

One doesn't speak of having a quantity of {ret}s, so one presumably
doesn't speak of having "some" {ret}s. You need the time period.

--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org