On Oct 1, 2017 00:50, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:


On 28 September 2017 at 19:06, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
magh            indicate,  reveal (v)

What do you have as the source of this definition? I am trying to verify this definition.

Anyone? I'm almost convinced that this is an error (or perhaps a trap, since the TKD definition of {magh} is "betray"). My notes claim it's a possible typo, with the source as Star Trek: Communicator. However, the text I have of STC issue #104, which is the only issue I'm aware of where new vocabulary was revealed, does not have this listed.

What is the origin of this definition?

-- 
De'vID