> I'm not sure using
ghIlo'meH for "glommer" is a more significant sin. (It does help if you explain what a "glommer" is,
> just in case some people are not totally familiar with esoteric Klingon lore.)
The word *ghIlo'meH* (has it been canonized?) has rather an interesting origin. As far as I can tell, it began its journey in the book
Star Trek: Forged in Fire, where the author decided to "klingonize" the word "glommer" as *glo'meH* (which violates ordinary syllable structure in exactly the same way that "glommer" does).
Then *glo'meH* was used as an English word in
How to Speak Klingon, which was then properly klingonized as *ghIlo'meH*.
It's essentially come about through a strange game of Telephone / Chinese Whispers ... but then again, I suppose that's true of much of language in general.
//loghaD
'ej chaq, *extended canon* mu' vIlo'ta'mo', jIHeghDI', Suto'vo'qorvo' mughIm qeylIS..
chaq not yo' qIj vImuvlaH, 'ej wa' meqmo' neH Sanvam vISIQ.. *extended canon* mu' vIlo'ta'mo' !