SuStel:
> The phrase Dochmey mI' is talking about
> numbers, not things;mI' is the head noun.

Impressive analysis. I could have never thought that something like this is happening.

However I need to ask you:

Does this mean that in any noun-noun construction, the head noun is the second one ?

qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'


On 8 Nov 2016 4:31 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 11/8/2016 2:47 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
mIp'av:
Dochmey mI' sounds like a direct translation of "number of things." Perhaps Klingons use such a phrase, perhaps not.
I used the {Dochmey mI'} in order to say "a number of things", because
I read somewhere at the klingon wiki, that we can use the {mI'} this
way. In fact here is the direct copy-paste from my notes:

----- quote start -----
mI' number (of), quantity tlhInganpu' Hem mI' nIb an equal number of
proud Klingons.
----- quote end -----

I had to look this up. It's from the page "Revelations of new rules inside paq'batlh."

The phrase Dochmey mI' is talking about numbers, not things; mI' is the head noun. The phrase number of things is talking about things. In your text, you were interested in the things, of which there are a number, not in the things' numbers, how many things there are. Dochmey mI' is an overly literal attempt to translate an English colloquialism.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org