SuStel:

> qama''e' qIppu'bogh neH

> the prisoner(s) whom he/she/it(/they) 

> merely hit

> only the prisoner(s) whom 

> he/she/it(/they) hit 

Couldn't this mean too "the prisoner who has been hit by only he/she/they/it" ? i.e. can't the {neH} be interpreted as acting on the elided subject ?

SuStel:

> qama'e' qIppu'bogh neH ghaH

> only the prisoner whom he/she hit

> the prisoner whom he/she merely hit 

If instead of the {ghaH} we had as a subject not a pronoun, but a noun, would this change anything ?

For example would the following be correct ?

Qel'e' qIpta'bogh neH la'

only the doctor who has been hit by the commander

the doctor who has been merely hit by the commander 

Perhaps it's a silly question, but something confuses me in the sentences where the subject is a pronoun.

~ mayqel qunen'oS