Thank you all for your replies - all duly noted! :)

And yes, I don't think it would make sense in any case to have other types of suffixes on 'Iv and nuq than type 5. 



2017-12-03 1:07 GMT+01:00 SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>:
On 12/2/2017 5:18 PM, nIqolay Q wrote:
I don't believe there are examples of {'Iv} or {nuq} being used with {-vaD} and {-mo'}. {​nuqDaq​} already provides a precedent for type 5 suffixes on question pronouns, though, and there's no rule explicitly preventing using other type 5s on {'Iv} and {nuq}. {nuqvaD} and {'Ivmo'} and so on all make clear sense semantically. You're probably fine to use them.

But we do have a canon example of nuq'e' (Sojvetlh 'oH nuq'e' from Power Klingon), which further supports the idea that you can put noun suffixes on these words. (My guess is that only type 5 suffixes would be allowed.)

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org