On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 at 19:38, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
ghunchu'wI':
> [I will temporarily suppress my belief that {lol} does not have a transitive
> meaning.]

I just assumed {lol} can take an object, but it's true that it might
not.

I got confirmation from Maltz that {lol} does *not* take an object when used for a martial arts stance. The verb to use for that is {much}.
 
--
De'vID