Do we have an official way to describe an object with two {-bogh} verbs?  If we want to use more than one verb that is not a "be" verb (or a more than two "be" verbs) how do we do that?  We have {yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI'}, but it doesn't seem good to me and I write it off as poetic licence.  Even if we consider {je} to be acting adverbally here, I still have trouble with the object of {yoH} being in the following sentence.  Has Dr. Okrand told us that this is the way to make two verbs describe one noun or are there better ways?

When TKD tells us that 'ej, pagh, and qoj conjoin sentences, what it really means is that they conjoin like verbal clauses. Most rules that talk about sentences also apply to verbal clauses. Some canonical examples of conjoined non-main-verb-clause verbal clauses:

SuDbogh Dargh 'ej wovbogh
the tea that is SuD and light (KGT)

romuluSngan Sambogh 'ej HoHbogh nejwI'
Romulan hunter-killer probe (KCD)

pay' HIvDI' lo'wI' pagh mupDI' QIHchu' bIH.
[literally:] when the user attacks suddenly or when he/she strikes, they damage completely (Skybox SP2)

...lengtaHvIS tlhInganpu' 'ej qo'mey Sar charghtaHvIS chaH...
[literally:] ...while Klingons travel and while they conquer various worlds... (Skybox SP1)

So feel free to conjoin dependent clauses as well as main clauses with the "sentence" conjunctions, including relative clauses.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name