If instead of {SoHtaHbe'chugh} we wrote {SoHbe'taHchugh}, and if instead of {vIta'pu'be'} we wrote {vIta'be'pu'}..

1. Would you accept these choices as equally correct ?

2. Meaning-wise, would you find that they are any different ?

I would accept them as grammatically valid but not necessarily identical in meaning.

The example with ta' is easier, because it's an actual verb. vIta'pu'be': I didn't ta'pu'. vIta'be'pu': I did ta'be'. The former describes a thing I might have done and says it didn't happen; the latter describes a thing I DID do, which is the not-doing of something. The distinction is subtle, and in most cases it wouldn't make a difference which you used.

The one with SoH is messier because pronouns only act like verbs when they interact with other words, and because it seems like -taH may be required when the pronoun is combined with a locative, but that isn't clear... If someone were to choose the other form than I did, I wouldn't have a problem, and I wouldn't even be sure there is a significant difference.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name