Am 11.10.2017 um 17:50 schrieb SuStel:
but here we're not expected to think of this as /many (different) electricities./ I don't think *Do law'* would automatically mean /many (different) velocities/ just by that logical alone.
I don't have canon examples at hand, but I'm sure that {law'} is not only "many" but also "much" (bIQ law' - "a lot of water", not "many waters"). So with noncountable things like {'ul law'} I don't read it as "many electricities", but "much electricity".
I looked a bit for law' on uncountable nouns, but 'ul was the only one I found.
I don't see how you distinguish between 'ul being
uncountable and Do being countable. Surely you can measure
electrical charge as well as you can measure velocity, and you can
have different measurements of electrical charge as you can have
different measurements of velocity. Grammatically, I see
absolutely no difference between these two words.
Now that we have *vItlh,* that's obviously the better choice for things like this. But you can't completely rule out using *law'.*
I think one can use this to distinguish between "a lot of speed, very fast {Do law'} and "a high amount of speed measured in numbers" {Do vItlh}.
I don't see the difference here, either. Using vItlh doesn't relate your sentence to numbers; you're just saying, that's a lot. Which is what law' is saying with 'ul law'.
I think the difference, which I just suggested in another message, is that vItlh is more general than law'. law' is only about quantity, while vItlh is about quantity or size or intensity or whatever it is by which you measure a thing. If you measure a big quantity, either law' or vItlh will do, though vItlh assumes the listener knows you're talking about quantity; if you measure a big size, either tIn or vItlh will do, though vItlh assumes the listener knows you're talking about size; if you measure a big strength, either HoS or vItlh will do, though vItlh assumes the listener knows you're talking about strength; and so on.
The energy field is strong.
HoS HoSchem
vItlh HoSchem
(Both say exactly the same thing. But you wouldn't say law' HoSchem for that meaning, and you wouldn't interpret vItlh HoSchem as there are many energy fields, because energy fields are usually measured by their strengths.)
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name