On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 17:15, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

There's something, which feels strange seeing/reading the {ghaHlu'}, but I can't find what it actually is.

I think this is impossible, because {-lu'} works with the pronominal prefixes, and pronouns never take prefixes. 

Prefixes aren't inherent to the job that -lu' plays. Using -lu' simply makes you use different prefixes.

The sentence Daqawlu'taH you will be remembered is simply a pronoun-elided version of SoH Daqawlu'taH. The prefix doesn't make the indefinite subject work; it simply agrees in a different way than sentences with subjects. All the -lu' really means is "no subject here."

I can't see any problem with using -lu' with the third-person pronouns. First- and second-person pronoun "to be" sentences use the pronoun itself as the subject; third-person "to be" sentences can take third-person nouns as their subjects. verengan ghaHlu'chugh, qurlu'ba' If one is a Ferengi, one is obviously greedy. This is just the no-subject equivalent to verengan ghaHchugh vay''e', qurba' vay'vetlh.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name