TKD gives the example {chollI'} "it (the torpedo) is getting closer"

"when it is known that the missile has been aimed at that target."

This does confirm that the thing does not itself have the intention to do what it does, a torpedoe does not "think" or "intend" to do what it does. The speaker does also not "intend" what is happening. He is neutral as describing what is going on: {chollI' peng} is to me the same as {pumlI' nagh}.

The restrictive side of the argument says that someone fired the torpedo and set its goal intentionally, and it is the firer's perspective that is generating the -lI'. Do you disagree with this argument?

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name