On 6/17/2022 10:11 AM, De'vID wrote:
I don't really see it as a new rule. I think it's more like a rule he has had in mind for a long time, and only partially explained previously.
What's an example of something that was wrong before but which is now right?
You're taking this as Okrand having thought all this out ahead of time and just not explaining it very well. I don't believe it. I think he didn't think things out so meticulously before, and now he's retrofitting an explanation that covers all the apparent contradictions and exceptions we've talked about over the years and which you showed to him. Kudos to him for finding an explanation that appears to work for everything, and I have no doubt that the original explanation of the prefix trick WAS simplified in the act of writing it, but I don't for a moment think this is the rule he was following all along. I think it took someone who had all the previous information coordinated for him to get him to finally piece it all together.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org