We know that we can't say:

{HoS'e' nuv mung}

for "the origin of the person of power"

But can we say:

{HoS'e' 'aghbogh nuv mung}

for "the origin of the power which is displayed by the person" ?

I know that the meaning isn't the same between the two examples, but that's not important.

What I'm wondering, is whether we can have a noun-noun construction, where the first noun is part of a {-bogh} clause, marked (that first noun} with a {-'e'}.

~ bara'qa'