Here are the variants of law'/puS and other comparatives we've gotten over the years.

A Q law' B Q puS
A is more Q than B

A Q law' Hoch Q puS
A is the most Q of all

Q A; rap B
B is as Q as A

Q A; nIb B
B is as Q as A (connotes precision)

A Q law' B Q rap
A is as Q as B

A Q puS B Q rap
A is as Q as B (connotes disparagement, seldom used)

A Q law' B Q nIb
A is as Q as B (connotes precision)

A Q law' B Q law'
A is as Q as B (connotes positive quality)

A Q puS B Q puS
A is as Q as B (connotes negative quality)

A Q law' B Q pIm
A's Q is different than B's Q (does not imply that one is more Q than the other, only that their Qs are different)

A Q law'be' B Q puSbe'
A is not more Q than B

Furthermore, wordplay, ungrammatical but common, allows one to substitute antonyms into the standard comparative and superlative constructions where law' and puS normally go. If the positive antonym is used in place of law' and the negative in place of puS, you get the same meaning as the standard law'/puS. If the order is reversed, you get A is less Q than B. The reversed version is seldom used. Okrand does not give any examples of doing this with Hoch in the B slot, but he says it can be done.

--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name