fergusq:

> There is a simple rule to follow when

> evaluating {-bogh} clauses: if you remove

> {-bogh}, the sentence should make

> sense.

I wasn't aware of this rule. Is this rule given by 'oqranD at some qep'a'/qepHom?

It's not a rule of Klingon; it's a rule of thumb to check the form of a relative clause. If you remove the -bogh, what you should be left with is a grammatical indicative sentence.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name