On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:14 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

> 'at, bay, chay, Day, 'et, ghay ... 'ut, way, yay, qaghwI'.
> To refer to an alphabet, syllabary, etc., we might say *{ngutlhghom} on the model
> of {mangghom} {army}, {mu'ghom} "dictionary" and {tIjwI'ghom} "boarding party.
> {ngutlhtlhegh} is another option - see {mu'tlhegh} "sentence" and {yutlhegh} "spectrum, (musical) scale".

Are the above a direct quote from 'oqranD ?

When you have questions of canonicity, it is often instructive to look at the source of the information. Voragh is pretty good about giving references; in this case "(MO via ghunchu'wI', 7/27/2009)". The mailing list archives are online.

http://www.kli.org/tlhIngan-Hol/2009/July/msg00191.html

None of it is a direct quote from Dr. Okrand. We are not [yet] in the habit of literally recording everything he speaks.

-- ghunchu'wI'