On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 22:20, <kechpaja@kechpaja.com> wrote:
While that is what the text would imply, without explicit confirmation
or contradiction from actual examples, I find myself wanting to default
to the {vIje' jIH rIntaH} version, the main reason for this being the
fact that {rIntaH} is marked as having a third person subject. My
intuition is to treat this construction as essentially a shortening of
{SENTENCE rIntaH 'e'}.

Is that {'e'} supposed to be the *subject* of {rIntaH}? {'e'} can't do that.

The construction is really an emphatic version of {vIje'ta' jIH}. The {rIntaH} is effectively replacing {-ta'} here. 

--
De'vID