lieven:> Theoretically, if ALL that Qov has translated is just fine,
> following the grammar, with no confusion - then why should
> we not show it?
In that case I want to ask, to include in boQwI' every other sentence every other grammarian has ever written.
If we note at the end of the entry "written by grammarian x, at that date and instance", then there isn't a problem, right ?
Speaking for myself, I trust SuStel and lojmIt tI'wI' nuv more than Qov. So, why include her sentences and exclude theirs, or yours ? You're a grammarian, right ? Why should I study Qov's sentences, and not yours ?
See my point ? The moment we accept anyone else's sentences as "material which should be studied", then we place ourselves on a slippery path.
qunnoq