Better yet:

romuluSngan HoHmeH Sambogh nejwI’ 

A Romulan probe which hunts in order to kill.

I know that will be shredded. It’s entirely wrong.

But it’s beautiful...

pItlh

charghwI’ ‘utlh
(ghaH, ghaH, -Daj)




On Jun 10, 2022, at 12:41 PM, Will Martin <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com> wrote:

I think the REAL mystery here is why he didn’t call it {romuluSngan SammeH ‘ej HoHmeH nejwI’}. Hunting and killing is the purpose of the device, not merely a description of its behavior. Then the model of its word order would have been even clearer.

pItlh

charghwI’ ‘utlh
(ghaH, ghaH, -Daj)




On Jun 10, 2022, at 11:31 AM, D qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

SuStel:
> You wouldn't say Sambogh 'ej romuluSngan HoHbogh 
> nejwI', would you? Of course not. Ask yourself why not.

(If I understand this matter correctly), I wouldn't say {Sambogh 'ej romuluSngan HoHbogh nejwI'} for the following reasons:

1. Reading it from left to right it isn't immediately clear who is being located and by who.

2. (After reading this thread) I'd understand it as "he/they who is/are located by him/them, and by a probe who kills Romulans".

3. There's no already stated noun which is then being replaced by a pronoun (if that's how we call words like "he, she, they, etc).

-- 
Dana'an
https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/
Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org